AI-native Engineering Platform

DevAgents OS

Your team uses AI. Every tool still works in isolation?

DevAgents OS connects specialized agents across requirements, architecture, code, quality, security, delivery, operations, and metrics. Shared context, traceability at every stage, and governance from day one.

How many handoffs happen between a requirement and the first commit? That's exactly where we start: mapping the workflow, activating the first agent, measuring the impact. Then we expand across the SDLC.

DemandAgentsEngineering FlowMetricsContinuous Improvement

Discover which agents would make sense for your current software lifecycle.

AGENTIC ORCHESTRATION LAYERReqArchCodeQASecDevOpsObsMetrics
∞ DevAgents OS
Beyond isolated AI assistants

Specialized agents across the SDLC

DevAgents OS is an AI-native engineering platform built on specialized agents. Agent orchestration coordinates these operations across the SDLC: requirements, architecture, development, testing, security, operations, metrics, and legacy modernization. Shared context, governance, and traceability are built in.

The differentiator is not using an isolated AI tool. It is agent orchestration: organizing specialized agents per lifecycle stage, preserving shared context across tools, measuring impact, and building a continuous improvement loop. Technical validation is applied at each stage.

Isolated AI usage

  • Isolated prompt, no lifecycle context
  • Context lost between tools
  • Manual handoff between stages
  • Hard to measure real impact
  • No governance or traceability across the process

AI-native engineering

  • Specialized agents across the SDLC
  • Shared context across the lifecycle
  • Tools and artifacts integrated
  • Governance, metrics, and traceability
  • Technical validation and accountable decisions

Orchestrate Agents

Connect requirements, architecture, code, tests, and operations into one governed workflow. Start with the handoff where your team loses the most context today.

Accelerate Engineering

Reduce rework and manual handoffs across requirements, documentation, code review, testing, and technical analysis. Structured agent assistance is available at each stage.

Govern with Data

Track efficiency, quality, bottlenecks, risk, and team evolution. Indicators are tied to real engineering outcomes and audit-ready traceability.

How Teams Start

From mapping to expansion

Every engagement starts with one workflow, the handoff where context loss costs the most, and expands as impact is measured and validated.

Assess your engineering workflow

We map where your team loses the most time and context today. For most engineering organizations, that is the transfer from requirements to engineering.

Activate your first agent

The Requirements Agent connects to your real workflow, turning meetings and backlog inputs into structured epics, user stories, and acceptance criteria.

Integrate with your existing stack

Connects with the tools your team already uses. No stack migration required to get started.

Measure and baseline impact

Cycle time, rework reduction, and traceability coverage are tracked from the first workflow to establish a measurable baseline.

Expand across the SDLC

With impact confirmed, the same orchestration model expands to architecture, code, quality, security, DevOps, and operations.

Business Model

Three ways to operate

DevAgents OS adapts to your team's reality, regardless of technical maturity or security requirements.

Managed Service

DevAgents OS operates the agents for you

We select models, providers, and integrations suited to the contracted scope. Your team focuses on the product while agents work under our operation and governance.

On-Premises License

The platform in your environment, under your control

The platform is deployed in your own infrastructure, with validation and integration with the models and tools defined by your team. Ideal for companies with compliance and security requirements.

Hybrid Model

Combines managed service and local autonomy

Combines managed service, licensing, support, updates, and governance according to technical maturity and security requirements. The transition between formats happens as your team evolves.

Proof, Not Just Claims

Requirements to engineering: how the first workflow runs

One workflow, fully connected. Then expand to the next.

The problem

Requirements live in meetings, chat threads, and documents. By the time they reach engineering, context is lost, rewritten, or simplified. Engineering ends up interpreting what someone meant instead of building from a shared, traceable source.

How DevAgents OS addresses it

The Requirements Agent turns meeting transcripts and backlog items into structured epics, user stories, and acceptance and exception criteria. All linked to a shared context layer the rest of the SDLC builds on.

What comes out of this workflow

  • Epics and user stories traceable to the meeting they came from
  • Acceptance criteria that separate decisions from discussion
  • Exception criteria that capture edge cases before they're forgotten

What we measure

Time from transcript to structured backlog, rework avoided through clearer criteria, and traceability coverage from requirement to delivered code.

The Agentic SDLC

From discovery to operations, orchestrated by agents

01
Discovery
initiativesepicsstoriescriteria
02
Architecture
componentsdecisionsrisksdependencies
03
Development
codereviewdocumentation
04
Quality
testsscenariosevidence
05
Security
vulnerabilitiesthreatscontrols
06
Delivery
pipelinesreleasesautomation
07
Operations
logsincidentsroot cause
08
Metrics
lead timecycle timethroughputquality
Orchestration
Agentic Orchestration Layer
Business impact

Less rework, more traceability, faster decisions, and data-driven improvement.

I want to map my SDLC to agents
Agent Catalog

Specialized Agents

Isolated AI tools don't solve the context problem. What moves the cycle is orchestration: each agent has a defined purpose, shares the same context layer, and is activated as the impact of the previous workflow is measured and confirmed.

AGENT.01

Requirement Agent

Acts on:meetings, requirements, backlog
Outputs:initiatives, epics, stories, criteria
Helps answer:What really needs to be built?
  • Meeting transcription
  • Epic and story creation
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Exception criteria
AGENT.02

Architecture Agent

Acts on:technical context, legacy, decisions
Outputs:components, risks, dependencies, documentation
Helps answer:Which design reduces risk and improves evolution?
  • Legacy system understanding
  • Component mapping
  • C4 Model support
  • Technical documentation
AGENT.03

Code Agent

Acts on:repositories, standards, technical tasks
Outputs:code, review, documentation
Helps answer:How to accelerate without losing technical standards?
  • Code generation
  • Code review
  • Technical documentation
  • Engineering best practices
AGENT.04

Quality Agent

Acts on:criteria, scenarios, expected behavior
Outputs:tests, Gherkin, evidence
Helps answer:How to validate earlier and reduce rework?
  • Automated test generation
  • Unit and integration tests
  • Gherkin and BDD
  • Test documentation
AGENT.05

Security Agent

Acts on:code, architecture, dependencies
Outputs:risks, threats, controls, recommendations
Helps answer:Where are the risks before going to production?
  • SAST and DAST
  • Threat modeling
  • Vulnerability analysis
  • AppSec controls validation
AGENT.06

DevOps Agent

Acts on:pipelines, releases, environments
Outputs:automation, diagnostics, improvement suggestions
Helps answer:Where is delivery getting stuck?
  • CI/CD pipeline development
  • Deployment automation
  • Release management
  • Pipeline failure analysis
AGENT.07

Observability Agent

Acts on:logs, metrics, incidents
Outputs:analyses, root cause, operational signals
Helps answer:What is happening in production?
  • Monitoring and logs
  • Operational metrics
  • Root cause analysis
  • Availability insights
AGENT.08

Metrics Agent

Acts on:flow, deliveries, quality, performance
Outputs:indicators, trends, bottlenecks
Helps answer:Where is the greatest gain potential?
  • Productivity and quality indicators
  • Lead time, cycle time, and throughput
  • Bottleneck identification
  • Continuous improvement support
AGENT.09

Legacy Modernization Agent

Acts on:legacy code, rules, technical structure
Outputs:fragments, extracted rules, new code, traceability
Helps answer:How to modernize without losing business rules?
  • Legacy code reading and fragmentation
  • Business rule extraction
  • Modern code generation
  • Traceability and functional validation
Enterprise Governance

Management and Governance Layer

Strategic, tactical, and operational visibility in a single data layer.

What do you actually know about the real impact of AI on your engineering today? Not estimates. Data. The governance layer connects what agents produce to what leadership needs to see: OKR progress, delivery velocity, quality trends, risk, and bottleneck visibility. No manual data collection required.

Strategic

Executive and director-level view: OKR alignment, engineering investment visibility, delivery speed, and portfolio-level risk indicators.

OKRs
12
Velocity
+24%
NPS
82

Coordination

Squad and program-level visibility: delivery volume, team capacity, predictability, cross-team dependencies, and tactical decision support.

Lead time
4.2d
Throughput
38
WIP
21

Operational

Agent-level and workflow-level metrics: lead time, cycle time, throughput, rework rate, test coverage, deployment frequency, change failure rate, and MTTR. Broken down by squad, by stage, by workflow.

Deploys/d
12
MTTR
28m
Coverage
84%

Metrics and charts above are illustrative examples. Your governance dashboard reflects real data from your engineering workflows from day one.

Decision questions
Q1Where are we gaining time?
Q2Where does bottleneck still exist?
Q3Which stage needs the next agent?
Q4Which improvement should be prioritized?
Models & Infrastructure

Model-aware and provider-flexible. The right model for each task.

DevAgents OS does not lock your engineering into a single AI provider. The orchestration layer selects the right model for each agent task and adapts as your stack, data requirements, and cost constraints evolve.

Each agent uses the model best suited to its task: long-context reasoning, code generation, evaluation, or orchestration. You choose the provider, the platform adapts.

Right model per task

Requirements analysis, architecture decisions, and code review demand different capabilities. The orchestration selects the right model for each agent, whether for long context, code generation, or evaluation, without manual configuration from the team.

Enterprise orchestration

Agent workflows, evaluation pipelines, observability, access control, and enterprise-grade governance. The infrastructure scales with your team, regardless of the AI provider you choose.

Flexible infrastructure

The orchestration layer deploys on the infrastructure that makes sense for your business, whether public, private, or hybrid cloud, integrated with your existing enterprise environment, security policies, and data residency requirements.

The platform is compatible with OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, open-source models, and local/private models. The choice depends on context, data residency, compliance, and cost. Provider flexibility is part of the architecture, not a roadmap item.

Impact

Impact Metrics

Real market references combined with practical indicators to accelerate engineering, quality, security, delivery, and modernization.

The market already demonstrates measurable gains from AI applied to software engineering. DevAgents OS transforms that potential into an AI-native operating model: specialized agents connected to the SDLC, stage-level metrics, tool integration, and governance to guide decisions.

84%
AI Adoption in Development

Of respondents use or plan to use AI tools in the development process, per the latest edition of the annual survey.

Market reference:Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025
View source
90%
Developers Already Using AI at Work

Of developers report using AI tools at work, evidencing accelerated adoption beyond one-off experimentation.

Market reference:DORA Report 2025
View source
42%
Code Currently AI-Generated

Of professional code is already AI-generated. The share is expected to grow to 65% by 2027, per the same survey.

Market reference:SonarSource State of Code 2024
View source
65%
AI Code Projection by 2027

Of code will be AI-generated by 2027, up from 42% already verified. Review and governance will scale alongside.

Market reference:SonarSource State of Code 2024
View source
55.8%
Tasks Completed Faster

In a controlled study with real developers, GitHub Copilot users completed a programming task 55.8% faster than the control group.

Market reference:GitHub Copilot Research | GitHub Blog
View source
20–45%
Software Engineering Potential

Estimated range of GenAI's potential impact on software engineering function productivity, per the McKinsey Global Institute.

Market reference:McKinsey Global Institute | Generative AI
View source
Up to 2×
Acceleration on Specific Tasks

Specific development tasks can be completed up to twice as fast with GenAI, including code generation, testing, and documentation.

Market reference:McKinsey | Developer Productivity with Generative AI
View source
Essential
Governance as a Differentiator

Scaled adoption requires human review, traceability, and operational governance. Teams that structure this reap sustainable productivity benefits.

Market reference:SonarSource | AI Verification Gap
View source
48%
AI Code Verification Gap

Of developers do not review AI-generated code with the same rigor applied to human-written code. A real risk that DevAgents OS helps address.

Market reference:SonarSource | AI Verification Gap
View source

Market references above reflect published research. Results in your environment will depend on your team's baseline, current tooling, workflow maturity, and integration scope. DevAgents OS uses these ranges to structure agents, set baselines, and track real progress. These are not guaranteed outcomes.

Model Selection: Fit by Context

The choice between OpenAI, Gemini, Claude, or private/local models should reflect your stack, data classification, security requirements, cost profile, and integration constraints. DevAgents OS structures this decision within the engineering workflow, not as a standalone technical choice.

Model family
OpenAI / Azure OpenAI / Codex
Google Gemini / Google Cloud
Anthropic Claude
Open-source / Local LLMs

The market shows the potential. DevAgents OS turns that potential into workflow, agents, metrics, and governance for your engineering.

I want to accelerate my engineering with agents
Continuous Operation

Improvement as an operating loop, not a project

Once the first workflow is live, the platform enters a continuous cycle: measure outcomes, identify the next highest-impact improvement, activate the next agent, and expand.

Deployment does not start by buying tools. It starts by understanding where engineering loses time, context, and quality. For most teams, that is the handoff from requirements to engineering.

ContinuousImprovement12345
1

Discover

Identify where the team loses time, context, and quality, and map the workflow with the highest improvement potential.

Output:current workflow map
2

Plan

Define success metrics, select integrations, establish a baseline, and set the scope for the first agent activation.

Output:baseline and reference metrics
3

Activate

Activate the appropriate agent, connect to your existing tools, configure shared context, and run the first assisted workflow.

Output:first agent applied to real workflow
4

Measure Impact

Compare before and after: cycle time, rework rate, traceability coverage, defect rates. Validate impact. Capture what the data shows.

Output:before/after comparison
5

Prioritize

Use governance data and the improvement backlog to select the next workflow and the next agent to activate.

Output:next automation backlog
Modernization

Legacy Modernization with AI Agents

The risk of modernization lies not just in rewriting code. It lies in losing business logic hidden inside aging systems.

Legacy modernization becomes safer with AI-native workflows: understanding legacy code, structural fragmentation, business rules extraction, modern code generation, and functional equivalence validation. All under agent orchestration, with technical validation at critical points.

Before

  • Aging codebase, hard to maintain
  • Low documentation of business rules
  • Dependency on legacy specialists
  • High risk of regression with every change

After

  • Business rules extracted and documented
  • Modern code generated, validated, and traceable
  • Automated tests with end-to-end traceability
  • Technical validation at every critical modernization stage
Traceability: Legacy rule → extracted rule → generated code → generated test → functional equivalence validation
STEP 1
Legacy Codebase
STEP 2
Structural Fragmentation
STEP 3
Business Rules Extraction
STEP 4
Agentic Code Generation
STEP 5
Functional Validation
01

Legacy Codebase

Legacy code from systems with high complexity and accumulated technical debt, ingested as the starting point.

02

Structural Fragmentation

The codebase is segmented into analyzable units so business rules and dependencies can be extracted without losing structural context.

03

Business Rules Extraction

Existing business rules are identified, extracted, and documented in structured, traceable form.

04

Agentic Code Generation

Modern code is generated by specialized agents, preserving the extracted business logic and maintaining traceability.

05

Functional Validation

Technical and functional validation confirms equivalence between the original behavior and the modernized output. Tests, traceability, and accountable modernization decisions are applied at every stage.

I want to modernize my legacy with agents
Ecosystem

Tool Ecosystem

Model-agnostic, tool-aware, and governance-driven: DevAgents OS integrates with the categories of tools your engineering team already uses. Specific examples vary per enterprise environment.

core
DevAgents OS
ai-models

AI Models and Agent Platforms

OpenAIAzure OpenAIAnthropic ClaudeGoogle GeminiAWS BedrockAmazon Q DeveloperLangGraphSemantic KernelCrewAIAutoGen
copilots

Engineering Copilots and Agentic IDEs

GitHub CopilotCursorWindsurfJetBrains AI AssistantGemini Code AssistAmazon Q Developer
repos

Repositories and Code Platforms

GitHubGitLabBitbucketAzure Repos
pm

Project and Product Management

JiraAzure BoardsLinearConfluenceNotionBackstage
cicd

CI/CD and DevOps

GitHub ActionsGitLab CIAzure PipelinesJenkinsArgo CDTerraformKubernetes
qa

Quality and Test Automation

PlaywrightCypressSeleniumJestJUnitNUnitPostmanPact
security

Security and AppSec

SonarQubeSnykCheckmarxVeracodeOWASP ZAPSemgrepDependabotTrivy
observability

Observability and Operations

GrafanaPrometheusDatadogDynatraceNew RelicOpenTelemetryELK / OpenSearch
architecture

Architecture and Design

C4 ModelStructurizrMiroFigmaMermaidPlantUML
knowledge

Knowledge and RAG

SharePointConfluenceNotionpgvectorPineconeWeaviateElasticsearch / OpenSearch

Examples shown are illustrative. The actual composition depends on each organization's stack, security policies, data residency requirements, repositories, and maturity level.

Origin

Built by someone who lived the problem

Cristiano Ferreira

Cristiano Ferreira

Founder · PULSEFLOW TECNOLOGIA LTDA

Cristiano has worked on both sides of the handoff DevAgents OS targets first: writing the requirements engineering has to interpret, and being the engineer who interprets requirements someone else wrote.

Next Step

Want to accelerate your engineering with agents, metrics, and governance?

We can map a real engineering workflow, identify bottlenecks, select the first agents, and establish metrics to measure impact and guide scale.